Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube
    HORROR SCREAMS VIDEO VAULT – SUPPORTING INDEPENDENT HORROR
    • Home
    • Film Reviews
      • Films Beginning With Numbers or Symbols
      • A – C
      • D – F
      • G – I
      • J – L
      • M – O
      • P – R
      • S – U
      • V – X
      • Y – Z
    • Book Reviews
    • Franchise Corner
    • Competitions
    • Horror Screams Podcast
    • Contact Us
    Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube
    HORROR SCREAMS VIDEO VAULT – SUPPORTING INDEPENDENT HORROR

    Film Review: MARY REILLY (1996)

    Peter 'Witchfinder' HopkinsBy Peter 'Witchfinder' Hopkins5th October 2021Updated:5th October 2021No Comments2 Mins Read

    MARY REILLY *** USA / UK 1996 Dir: Stephen Frears. 108 mins

    Adapted by Christopher Hampton from Valerie Martin’s novel, this tail-end entry in Hollywood’s early 90’s Gothic horror cycle (spun off from Coppola’s BRAM STOKER’S DRACULA) was a costly failure at the time and misleadingly sold as a full-blown genre film. Hampton’s take on Stevenson’s classic novel puts the focus on the title character (Julia Roberts), the physically / emotionally scarred housemaid of Henry Jekyll (John Malkovich). Haunted by the suffering doled out by her brutish father (Michael Gambon), she enjoys a close, if odd, relationship with her employer while also being drawn to his charming acquaintance Mr. Hyde (Malkovich), the one who has been clobbering aristocrats and slashing up prostitutes in the city.

    Admirably restrained in terms of onscreen horrors, Frears’ deliberately paced movie pivots around an affecting, moving performance by Roberts as the downtrodden Mary – if you can get past the wandering Oirish accent, it’s a brave star turn. Malkovich underplays effectively as both Jekyll and Hyde, though Glenn Close has the most fun hamming it up as monstrous brothel keeper Mrs Farraday. The most impressive thing about the movie is its downbeat overall tone, reflected by Phillippe Rousselot’s appropriately grim cinematography: the whole film is enveloped by a sense of death and decay. What it doesn’t have – and what would have alienated 1996 audiences – is a sense of dramatic momentum and tension: Hammer in its prime would have balanced the character study with Gothic horror tropes and more sheer entertainment value. (Indeed, their two revisionist attempts at the story – TWO FACES OF DR. JEKYLL and DR. JEKYLL AND SISTER HYDE – are stronger movies all round).

    Review by Steven West

     

    FacebookLikeShareTweetPin
    Dr. Jekyll Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde Drama Fabulous Films Glenn Close Horror John Malkovich Julia Roberts Mary Reilly Michael Gambon Mr. Hyde Romance Stephen Frears

    Related Posts

    Film Review: THE HOUSE OF THE SERPENT (2022)

    12th May 202503 Mins Read
    Read More

    VIPCO & BayView Entertainment release dramatic thriller CURSED BY HAPPINESS

    7th May 202501 Min Read
    Read More

    BayView Entertainment dare you to witness 31 KILLS OF HALLOWEEN

    30th April 202501 Min Read
    Read More

    Trailer Drops for British Psychological Horror Film ‘The Cellar’ plus Premiere news

    27th March 202501 Min Read
    Read More

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Recent Posts
    • Indie Underground Filmmakers unite for Amityverse: End Game – The Curse Ends Here?
    • First Images From NEW The Return of the Living Dead Movie, Trash’s Revenge
    • Voodoo Horror Thrives In “Bitter Souls” – Official Trailer
    • “SHOOT FROM THE HIP: RISE OF THE PHANTOM” starring Jimmy Drain, Natasha Coppola-Shalom, Mohawk Bob Bagnall,Dawna Lee Heising, & more has its red carpet premiere
    • This Christmas Horror will give you a SHIVER
    Archives
    Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.