Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube
    HORROR SCREAMS VIDEO VAULT – SUPPORTING INDEPENDENT HORROR
    • Home
    • Film Reviews
      • Films Beginning With Numbers or Symbols
      • A – C
      • D – F
      • G – I
      • J – L
      • M – O
      • P – R
      • S – U
      • V – X
      • Y – Z
    • Book Reviews
    • Franchise Corner
    • Competitions
    • Horror Screams Podcast
    • Contact Us
    Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube
    HORROR SCREAMS VIDEO VAULT – SUPPORTING INDEPENDENT HORROR

    Film Review: MARY REILLY (1996)

    Peter 'Witchfinder' HopkinsBy Peter 'Witchfinder' Hopkins5th October 2021Updated:5th October 2021No Comments2 Mins Read

    MARY REILLY *** USA / UK 1996 Dir: Stephen Frears. 108 mins

    Adapted by Christopher Hampton from Valerie Martin’s novel, this tail-end entry in Hollywood’s early 90’s Gothic horror cycle (spun off from Coppola’s BRAM STOKER’S DRACULA) was a costly failure at the time and misleadingly sold as a full-blown genre film. Hampton’s take on Stevenson’s classic novel puts the focus on the title character (Julia Roberts), the physically / emotionally scarred housemaid of Henry Jekyll (John Malkovich). Haunted by the suffering doled out by her brutish father (Michael Gambon), she enjoys a close, if odd, relationship with her employer while also being drawn to his charming acquaintance Mr. Hyde (Malkovich), the one who has been clobbering aristocrats and slashing up prostitutes in the city.

    Admirably restrained in terms of onscreen horrors, Frears’ deliberately paced movie pivots around an affecting, moving performance by Roberts as the downtrodden Mary – if you can get past the wandering Oirish accent, it’s a brave star turn. Malkovich underplays effectively as both Jekyll and Hyde, though Glenn Close has the most fun hamming it up as monstrous brothel keeper Mrs Farraday. The most impressive thing about the movie is its downbeat overall tone, reflected by Phillippe Rousselot’s appropriately grim cinematography: the whole film is enveloped by a sense of death and decay. What it doesn’t have – and what would have alienated 1996 audiences – is a sense of dramatic momentum and tension: Hammer in its prime would have balanced the character study with Gothic horror tropes and more sheer entertainment value. (Indeed, their two revisionist attempts at the story – TWO FACES OF DR. JEKYLL and DR. JEKYLL AND SISTER HYDE – are stronger movies all round).

    Review by Steven West

     

    FacebookLikeShareTweetPin
    Dr. Jekyll Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde Drama Fabulous Films Glenn Close Horror John Malkovich Julia Roberts Mary Reilly Michael Gambon Mr. Hyde Romance Stephen Frears

    Related Posts

    Suspenseful dramatic thriller WHITE ROSES drops on Digital Platforms worldwide

    11th May 202601 Min Read
    Read More

    Twisted thriller THE THIRD LAW releases on Digital Platforms. “For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.”

    11th May 202602 Mins Read
    Read More

    ‘THE WAVES OF MADNESS’ – A DIY Lovecraftian Side-Scroller Horror Film

    2nd May 202603 Mins Read
    Read More

    4K restoration of John Carpenter’s cult sci-fi classic DARK STAR available now

    2nd May 202603 Mins Read
    Read More

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Recent Posts
    • Puppets, Horror, and Comedy Together in New FOUND Original Premiering July 24
    • The Ultimate Point of View: How FoundFootage.com Became the Definitive Archive for POV Cinema
    • First Look of The Stutterer Horror Slasher Film in production
    • Slick Heist Turns Into Voodoo Horror in Gritty Supernatural Horror-Comedy ‘The Hoodoos’
    • Ride the Sci-Fi Wave: Why Alien and UFO Creators Need Marketing Macabre Right Now
    Archives
    Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.